How Depression was Treated in Medieval Times?

 

Europe

The Middle Ages carried on the classical idea of depression being rooted in one’s disfavor with the gods, but this time the gods were those of Christianity, rather than the Greek pantheon. For clerics in Medieval Europe, melancholy was a sign that one was living sinfully and in need of repentance. In fact, severe melancholy was sometimes seen as a sign of demonic possession. John Cassian, a monk known for his mystical writings, called melancholy the “noonday demon,” in reference to Psalm 91. He recommended that melancholics withdraw from family and friends and perform hard manual labor in solitude as punishment for their sins.

 

 

Not only was melancholy seen as a sign of sinfulness, being in a depressed state was considered sinful in and of itself; the Latin word for the deadly sin of sloth, acedia, was broadly defined and included everything from laziness to melancholy. In fact, many of the clerics who wrote about individuals beset with acedia described them as being in the throws of depression. For example, Cassian describes a fellow “slothful” monk this way:

“He looks about anxiously this way and that, and sighs that none of the brethren come to see him, and often goes in and out of his cell, and frequently gazes up at the sun, as if it was too slow in setting, and so a kind of unreasonable confusion of mind takes possession of him like some foul darkness.”

The Canterbury Tales, written in the 14th century, similarly describes the slothful person as one who is filled with despair, loss of hope, and “outrageous sorrow.” This excessive low mood is followed by sluggishness and general apathy towards life, which in turn prevents the slothful person from performing good works. If not repented of, sloth becomes a sin against the Holy Ghost. Andrew Solomon, author of The Noonday Demon, suggests that this connection between melancholy and the sin of sloth may have given rise to much of the stigma that surrounds depression today.

 



From the 4th century, the Christian hermit movement will highlight the dangers of melancholy. The anchorites are Christians who decide to live in solitude and for that they retire to the desert to break with a society they consider in perdition. In this isolation, one of the dangers that threatens them is acedia. The acedia is, initially, a discomfort linked to the excess of deprivation which seizes the monks. This term means "negligence", "grief", "indifference". By seizing this symptom, which among the desert monks is rather psychic discomfort than "evil", Christians turn it into emissions of evil and evil thoughts. It becomes the most formidable temptations in connection with the demon and the moral fault. Acedia becomes a divine punishment. It will haunt the monasteries of the West but also the secular society until the end of the Middle Ages.

Intriguingly, the origins of this particular and peculiar term are actually quite clear: the writings of Evagrius Ponticus, a 4th century monk living as "part of a cluster of hermit colonies [...] some forty to sixty miles south of Alexandria. He described it as a demon, which leads the monk to "hatred against this place, against life itself, and against the work of his hands, and makes him think he has lost the love among his brethren and there is none to comfort him." This is pre-medieval, but as above, it forms the foundation for acedia, and will change little through later centuries. Note before we move on that acedia is not the same as depression (or even melancholia) and that it is not the same as sloth. "Lassitude, weariness, inaction, carelessness, and neglect were all aspects of acedia," but it would be an inaccurate depiction to merely leave it there.

Evagrius' description would be conveyed into the Medieval era by John Cassian's *Twelve Books on the Institutes of the Coenobia [=monastaries] and the Remedies for the Eight Principal Faults." One of these faults was the spirit of accidie, to which Cassian devotes book 10. When it "has taken possession of some unhappy soul," he writes, "it [...] makes the man lazy and sluggish [...] he complains that he is cut off from spiritual gain, and is of no use in the place." When and if it overcame a monk, "it either [made] him stay in his cell idle and lazy, without making any spiritual progress, or it [drove] him out from thence and [made] him restless and a wanderer, and indolent in the matter of all kinds of work".

Over the course of the Medieval era, acedia evolved. Some lists of the chief vices omitted it entirely; Gregory the Great subsumed it under dejection (he also lowered the number of sins to seven.) As the 11th century bled into the 12th, acedia underwent "a shift in emphasis from mode of behavior to state of mind." At this point, acedia was still largely restricted to men of God, but after the fourth Lateran council (of 1215) mandated mass religious education, acedia became more and more a part of public consciousness.

While acedia was a sin, it was still something that could be treated, by penance or confession. There was (and is?) a long history of priests as healers of the soul, and this medicalization of sin certainly existed in these case of acedia. It was also following the Lateran reforms that acedia began its transformation into sloth: while it had previously been emphasized as a state of mind, "the common man's image of acedia came to center around spiritual idleness or neglect in the performance of spiritual duties."

Treatments for mental disorder were quite diverse. Some were theoretically based: bloodletting, baths, head surgery, or a diet change to rid oneself of noxious humors: sexual diversion to aid the lovesick: exorcism and Holy Communion to aid the possessed. Others were not: music, pleasant scenes, prayer, and religious relics were thought to be beneficial regardless of the diagnosis (which was often tentatively held in any case). Records of the illnesses of the painter Hugo van der Goes (c. 1435-.1482 CE) and the French King Charles VI (1368-1422 CE) portray well-meaning onlookers suggesting a variety of diagnoses and remedies, none of them very successful. An instance of the solicitude shown Charles during his periods of illness was his court’s procurement of a mistress, Odette de Champ-divers, when the king refused to recognize his wife.

Persia

A Persian doctor named Rhazes (865–925 CE), however, did see mental illness as arising from the brain. He recommended such treatments as baths and a very early form of behavior therapy which involved positive rewards for appropriate behavior.

 


Rhazes, whose full name was Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi (865–925 AD), was a Persian physician, chemist, and philosopher who made significant contributions to the fields of medicine and alchemy during the Islamic Golden Age. While Rhazes did not specifically address depression as a distinct disorder, his works contained valuable insights into the treatment of various mental and emotional conditions, which could be related to what we now understand as depression. Here are some of his views on treatment:

1.       Holistic Approach: Rhazes advocated for a holistic approach to medicine, emphasizing the importance of considering the physical, psychological, and social aspects of a patient's well-being. He believed that illness could result from imbalances in these areas.

2.       Diet and Lifestyle: Rhazes recognized the role of diet and lifestyle in maintaining health and preventing illness. He advised patients to adopt a balanced diet, engage in regular physical activity, and maintain a harmonious daily routine. These recommendations aimed at promoting overall well-being, which could indirectly benefit mental health.

3.       Humoral Theory: Like many scholars of his time, Rhazes adhered to the humoral theory, which posited that imbalances in bodily humors (blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile) could lead to illness. While this theory is outdated by modern standards, it influenced his approach to treatment, including treatments for conditions that might today be categorized as depressive.

4.       Therapeutic Regimens: Rhazes recommended therapeutic regimens that included various interventions, such as dietary adjustments, herbal remedies, and physical activities. He believed that restoring the balance of bodily humors could help alleviate physical and mental symptoms.

5.       Psychological Care: Rhazes recognized the importance of a patient's mental and emotional state in the healing process. He encouraged providing emotional support and reassurance to patients as part of their treatment.

6.       Avoidance of Excessive Stress: Rhazes acknowledged that chronic stress and overwhelming life circumstances could negatively impact a person's health. He recommended avoiding excessive stressors and adopting relaxation techniques, which could indirectly benefit mental well-being.

7.       Use of Herbal Remedies: Rhazes was known for his contributions to pharmacology and the use of herbal remedies. While his focus was primarily on physical ailments, some of the herbs and natural substances he recommended might have had mood-altering effects that could be beneficial for individuals experiencing emotional distress.

 

 

Sources and Additional Information:

https://www.artofmanliness.com/health-fitness/health/the-history-of-depression/

https://www.verywellmind.com/who-discovered-depression-1066770

https://www.peertechzpublications.com/articles/ADA-6-145.php

https://psychology.iresearchnet.com/history-of-psychology/middle-ages/mental-illness-in-the-middle-ages/

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...